Comments on: That’s No Moon Watch

By: Samukun

Samukun — Fri, 13 Jul 2012 22:09:18 +0000

Cool review Raziel, thank you!

By: Raziel

Raziel — Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:17 +0000

I would love to buy this watch it would definitely sell especially if it is given a touch screen. I love how it combines this somewhat sundial method with phases of the moon then turns it digital.

By: Samukun

Samukun — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:39:40 +0000

Hey, thanks for checking! You can only get those with this hour-movement hehehe >:) If you like these numbers, wait for AEON…

By: Makkovik

Makkovik — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:08:51 +0000

It’s a nice idea. At first I thoght the crater used for the minutes was ruining it by always moving, but then I realized that it’s only moving once per hour. ( it’s still is a minor concern ) The minutes digits are nice.

By: Samukun

Samukun — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:35:56 +0000

Thanks Fir

By: Firdaus

Firdaus — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:52:44 +0000

Good design, but not my cuppatea this one. 4*

By: Samukun

Samukun — Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:28:14 +0000

Thanks JP!

By: JP

JP — Thu, 28 Jun 2012 04:45:43 +0000

If TF doesn’t make this watch, they’re making a mistake.

By: Samukun

Samukun — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:17:31 +0000

I have a simlar idea in the works, but it’s not easy to make it look good. Thanks for the inspiration!!

By: Pete

Pete — Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:16:05 +0000

Hey Sam, You know what would look nice, a wire frame version. Like an early computer game graphic, the sphere could be made up of curved horizontal and vertical lines. The shaded parts having denser lines etc or hatching. Just a thought

By: Samukun

Samukun — Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:18:16 +0000

SPOILER ALERT

Hehe, but you need to know, young padawan, the midichlorians are actually electronic ink microcapsules.

By: TheSquirrelKing

TheSquirrelKing — Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:36:56 +0000

The Force is strong with this one!

By: Patrick

Patrick — Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:22:43 +0000

This watch “That’s No Moon Watch” is unique, as all your projects, Sam cheer!

By: Samukun

Samukun — Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:53:01 +0000

ありがとうございます、ブレントさん( ﾟ▽ﾟ)

By: Samukun

Samukun — Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:48:44 +0000

No you’re not missing anything – counting it is. 2 vs 3? Thats a bit too tired I could understand 8 vs 9 but that’s just 4 vs 3 steps left of the 12 or 2 vs 3 steps right of the middle (6). Everyone has his/her own counting tricks I guess that sound more complicated when writing them down than they actually are.

I’m glad that the round digits appeal. You will see them again.